Socialization
In our world today, which
admittedly is a very “plugged-in” society, people are starting to socialize and
communicate through online information technologies more and more often. This
consists of facebook, skype, other social media sites, and various forms of
instant and text messaging. Watkins
(2009), claims that it “reshapes how we experience community.” He also expands
on the idea of “presence in absence” and “absence in presence." These ideas
basically state that if one is absorbed in communicating through their
technology, and not with the people physically around them, one is “absent” in
the physical space and community they exist in. However, because one is
communicating and thinking through the technology, they are “present” with
those they are communicating with despite being physically absent. This idea is
multiplied in Feed, because nearly
all communication is done on the feed, even cutting down on physical speech.
This adds new dynamics to social interactions, because in a group of
people, it is not only possible, but likely, that people are silently
discussing one another. Without the
feed, people are left out of an important aspect of life and socializing. The feed has taken over their method of communication completely.
In the Feed world, the corporations own the feednet, and by extension,
have control over nearly all of the population. Their goal is to create
consumer profiles for each of the feed users, in order to more effectively
target them for advertisements and get them to spend money. This is also done in today’s world. Google,
and other companies, target users to try to create and mold results for them
that will increase their likelihood of sales.
These companies all gather vast amounts of data on users and do
different things with that information. Manovich (2012), says that “companies make
money by analyzing patterns in the data they collect about our online and
physical behavior and target their offerings, ads, sales events, and promotions
accordingly; in other cases they sell this data to other companies.” This is exactly what the owners of the
feednet do in the novel, and its origins are clearly found right here in the
world of today.
Data mining
is also used for a new form of consumer evaluation, called e-scores. These
scores are “an online calculation…that measure[s] our potential value as
customers” (Singer, 2012). These scores
are compiled by companies that then sell the scores to businesses that are
looking for potential clients. However, the use of e-scores also results in the
ranking of potential consumers, which some people see as unfair and unethical,
because it gives preference to some people over others. This could quickly
become an issue of the digital divide, deepening it, as some people believe the
use of e-scores will place them into a “digital disadvantage.”
Consumer
profiling lead to a huge decrease in individuality and independent thought in
the novel. Our world is in danger of this outcome as well.
Digital Divide
The digital divide is a classic
issue of the “have” and “have-not” variety.
In Feed, 73% of society is
implanted with the feed. The users of the feed are shown in the book to be
oblivious to those without it. Titus is shocked when he found out that Violet
got her feed so late, and that her father doesn’t have one. People with the
feed are able to learn more effectively and quickly, as well as the fact that
they are more likely to get jobs and earn more money. Those without the feed
cannot tune in to “School TM” and thus are expected to learn and keep up with
the other students, despite the disadvantage of not having unlimited
information instantly available. This scenario is easily compared to the
digital divide of today, which some would claim is shrinking, while others
would claim is growing. There are huge
amounts of new and innovative information technologies that are increasing the
ability to learn, and the effectiveness of education. However, many people do
not have access to these technologies. This problem becomes a vicious cycle,
where the people who are trained and have access to new technologies are able
to learn more quickly and get better jobs, and they continue to have easier
access to new technologies, while many people who were left behind in the
beginning are never able to catch up. Eubanks (2011), states this clearly, noting
“There is nothing intrinsic to the information economy that delivers the level
playing field, flattened hierarchies, and increased opportunity… rather, it
injects more unpredictable, explosive change into an economic field already
marked by durable disparity.” If the world of Feed were real, their digital divide is uncrossable. Our divide
still has a chance, so we must fight to try to close this looming gap.
No comments:
Post a Comment